Article 10419

Title of the article

COMPREHENSIVE SURGICAL REHABILITATION IN PATIENTS WITH CONSEQUENCES OF ACUTE PARAPROCTITIS OF ANAEROBIC ETIOLOGY 

Authors

Nikol'skiy Valeriy Isaakovich, Doctor of medical sciences, professor, sub-department of surgery, Medical Institute, Penza State University (40, Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia), E-mail: pmisurg@gmail.com
Sergatskiy Konstantin Igorevich, Candidate of medical sciences, аssосiate professor, sub-department of surgery, Medical Institute, Penza State University (40, Krasnaya street, Penza, Russia), E-mail: sergatsky@bk.ru 

Index UDK

616-089:616-08 

DOI

10.21685/2072-3032-2019-4-10 

Abstract

Background. After forced necrectomy and elimination of anaerobic infection in patients with acute anaerobic paraproctitis, it is often necessary to eliminate postoperative skin defects and eliminate the colostomy. The aim of the study was to analyze the results of surgical rehabilitation in patients after acute anaerobic paraproctitis.
Materials and methods. 58 patients underwent retrospective analysis with the effects of acute anaerobic paraproctitis, which required surgical rehabilitation.
Results. Early surgical rehabilitation of the consequences of acute anaerobic paraproctitis was performed in 54 cases (93.1 %). Late surgical rehabilitation measures were taken in 8 patients (13.8 %) who had acute paraproctitis of anaerobic etiology.
Conclusions. Patients who have undergone acute paraproctitis of anaerobic etiology need early and late surgical rehabilitation. 

Key words

acute anaerobic paraproctitis, surgical rehabilitation, long-term treatment results 

Download PDF
References

1. Goryunov S. V., Abramov I. S., Chapar'yan B. A., Egorkin M. A., Zhidkikh S. Yu. Rukovodstvo po lecheniyu ran metodom upravlyaemogo otritsatel'nogo davleniya [Controlled negative pressure wound healing guide]. Moscow: Aprel', 2013, 130 p. [In Russian]
2. Atik B., Tan O., Ceylan K., Etlik O., Demir C. Urology. 2006, vol. 68, pp. 419–422.
3. Innocenti A., Tanini S., Mori F., Melita D., Innocenti M. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016, vol. 28, pp. 300–302. DOI 10.1016/j.ijscr.2016.10.031.
4. Bedenko V. E., Chernyak A. V., Tsiplyugin A. M., Kryachko A. A., Prostakov E. N. Vestnik khirurgicheskoy gastroenterologii [Bulletin of surgical gastroenterology]. 2012, no. S, pp. 86–87. [In Russian]
5. Bolkvadze E. E., Mudarisov R. R., Obukhov V. K., Alekperov E. E., Kozhin D. G. Koloproktologiya [Coloproctology]. 2014, no. S3 (49), p. 14. [In Russian]
6. Kantsaliev L. B., Kairov G. B., Teuvov A. A. Materialy pervogo s"ezda khirurgov yuzhnogo federal'nogo okruga [Proceedings of the first congress of surgeons of the Southern Federal District]. Rostov-on-Don, 2007, pp. 143–144. [In Russian]
7. Mikhaylova V. M., Ignat'ev V. G., Kholtosunov I. A., Solov'ev A. A., Krivoshapkina L. A., Nikiforov A. Yu. Acta Biomedica Scientifica. 2012, no. S4 (86), pp. 69–70.
8. Marino F., Manca G. Int Wound J. 2017, vol. 14 (2), p. 439. DOI 10.1111/iwj.12627.
9. Egorkin M. A. Rossiyskiy zhurnal gastroenteorologii, gepatologii i koloproktologii [Russian journal of gastroenterology, hepatology and coloproctology]. 2011, no. 3, pp. 74–79. [In Russian]
10. Kurbanov U. A., Davlatov A. A., Dzhononov D. D., Kurbanov Z. A. Vestnik Avitsenny [Bulletin of Avicenna]. 2010, no. 3 (44), pp. 13–18. [In Russian]
11. Chukhrienko D. P., Lyul'ko A. V. Atlas operatsiy na organakh mochepolovoy sistemy [Atlas of operations of urogenital system organs]. Moscow: Meditsina, 1972, 376 p. [In Russian]
12. Oufkir A. A., Tazi M. F., El Alami M. N. Indian J Urol. 2013, vol. 29 (4), pp. 360–362. DOI 10.4103/0970-1591.120132.
13. Perry T. L., Kranker L. M., Mobley E. E., Curry E. E., Johnson R. M. Wounds. 2018, vol. 30 (10), pp. 290–299.

 

Дата создания: 07.04.2020 13:17
Дата обновления: 13.04.2020 12:58